Search This Blog

IDENTIFY PAP'S WEAKEST LINK IN NEE SOON GRC - VOTE NOW!

The new Nee Soon GRC is birthed from the PAP gerrymandering tactics. It is put together from the former Nee Soon East and Nee Soon Central SMCs, vacated by the retirement of old-timers Ho Peng Kee Ong Ah Heng respectively, and parts of Sembawang and Ang Mo Kio GRCs.

K Shanmugam, the hardman of PAP who is concurrently Minister of Home Affairs and Law, heads the Nee Soon GRC. Joining him from the Sembawang GRC is Dr Lim Wee Kiak, Ang Mo Kio’s Lee Bee Wah, Marine Parade’s Assoc Prof Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim and newcomer Patrick Tay.

Interestingly the PAP lost Nee Soon Central to the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) in 1991.  The Nee Soon GRC team does not seem all that strong and not all the PAP candidates here look equally capable. Can a repeat of history be on the cards? Will a single candidate be responsible for bringing down the team?

Who is The Weakest Link? Singaporeans, the answer lies with you.  


Candidate 1:  Lee Bee Wah

Lee is amongst a handful of Malaysia-born PAP candidates. Belying the fact that she holds a Master of Science (Engineering) from the UK, Lee has succeeded in bringing public discourse in Singapore to new lows. Following a call in parliament by the Workers’ Party for the government to delay a GST increase, Lee rebutted crudely in Hokkien that “My mother always tells me that when you want to pass motion, you have to find a toilet first”. Her mismanagement of the Singapore Table Tennis Association (STTA), which included a highly publicised bust-up with the team manager and coaches at the Beijing Olympics, led to an open petition for her removal as President. In line with the ruling party’s principle of belittling all public opinion, Lee turned a complete deaf ear to the call and remains squatting in her post.


Highest Education Qualifications
Master of Science (Engineering), University of Liverpool (United Kingdom)

Career
1985
Senior Engineer, St Construction Pte Ltd
1994
Asst. Project Manager, Wing Tai Property Management Pte Ltd
1996-Present
Principal Partner, LBW Consultants / LBW Consultants LLP

Board Directorships
Director, LBW Engineering Pte Ltd
Director, Merseyside International Pte Ltd
Director, Nanyang Learning House Pte Ltd
Director, Trailblazer Foundation Ltd
Independent and Non-Executive Director, Tee International Ltd

Other Key Appointments
Fellow Member, Institution of Engineers Singapore 
Board member, Professional Engineers Board, Singapore
President, Singapore Table Tennis Association


Candidate 2: Dr Lim Wee Kiak
A leading eye doctor in Singapore. The normally non-controversial Dr Lim recently attracted public criticism when he was asked by the press to comment on a report that the Ministry of Manpower is spending $271,400 on designer ergonomic chairs for its staff. A member of the Public Accounts Committee, Dr Lim defended the decision, saying, “if the employer thinks the workers need to protect their backs from injuries in the long term, then fair enough”.


Highest Education Qualifications
Masters of Medicine (National University of Singapore)

Career
1992
Medical Officer, Ministry of Health
1994
Medical Officer, MINDEF
2001
Registrar, SINGHEALTH
2003
Consultant, SNEC
2006-Present
Consultant Eye Surgeon, Singapore National Eye Centre
2007-Present
Deputy Director, The Eye Institute, National Healthcare Group
2007-Present
Head of Ocular Inflammation and Uveitis, Tan Tock Seng Hospital
2007-Present
CEO of Eagle Eye Centre, Mount Alvernia Hospital

Other Key Appointments
Chairman, Uveitis and ocular inflammation subspecialty committee, College of Ophthalmologists, Singapore
Chairman, Ngee Ann Polytechnic's Optometry Advisory Committee (OAC)


Candidate 3:  Patrick Tay Teck Guan


Tay is an ex-cop with the SPF’s elite Special Tactics and Rescue team. He is amongst the cluster of PAP-NTUC candidates, albeit a unionist who appears to be on the ground rather than on the heights of upper management. Putting to good use his police experience, he managed to round-up private security officers in the country to join the Union of Security Employees, which saw its membership explode from 500 in 2004 to 12,000 today. Better unionization or are we merely seeing more poor Singaporeans becoming “jagas” to eke out a livelihood?


Highest Education Qualifications
Master of Laws (honours), NUS

Career
Past
Singapore Police Force's Special Tactics and Rescue (STAR)
2002
Industrial relations officer; chief IRO of Shipbuilding and Marine engineering Employees Union, NTUC 
2004-2005
Executive secretary, Union of Security Employees
2006-Present
Executive secretary, Healthcare Services Employees' Union; Advisor/Senior Consult, Union of Security Employees 


Candidate 4: Assoc Prof Dr Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim
A/P Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim is Programme Director, MSc (Real Estate) at the Department of Real Estate in the NUS. However he is practically nondescript as a politician. Entered parliament via a walkover in the Marine Parade GRC five years ago.


Highest Education Qualifications
PhD (Management Sciences), University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology

Career
1993
Valuer, Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore
1996
Senior Tutor, National University of Singapore
2000-Present
Assistant Professor, National University of Singapore


(Note: As you are participating in a free and open forum, you would agree to take full personal responsibility for the contents of your contribution. Defamatory statements, unsubstantiated allegations, unwarranted vulgarities, racist comments, denigration of other contributors and other posts of no relevance will be removed.)

5 comments:

  1. All of them are definitely ... no doubt about it ... the weakest link ... riding on a free trip to where they are now ... So my question is ... WHO SHALL I VOTE ??????????

    ReplyDelete
  2. Me Again ... TRY INCLUDE : "NONE OF THE ABOVE" in the voting game :) Why didn't you do that ??? We gone through all that in our education system ... didn't we ???

    ReplyDelete
  3. "None of the above" is in-built already. To exercise this option:

    1. Move your mouse cursor to the top right hand corner of your browser;

    2. Left-click the "X" button.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If you choose "None of the above" it suggests you should opt for an alternative if given the choice. Or are you one of those voters who either vote PAP or spoil you vote even though there may be an alternative. In the past, opposition candidates were not so impressive but now we are given quality candidates, so take this opportunity to give them a chance to show us what they can do. If we don't ever give them a chance, how will we ever get a strong opposition to represent the down-trodden in our society or to represent our views when PAP increases in arrogance and shut their eyes and ears to the misery in the lower strata of society with the increasing widening of income gap.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foots on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality" - Desmond Tutu

    ReplyDelete